13 Nov 2008 … The disputed domain name <aututrader.com> is registered with …. The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has deliberately chosen to register a domain name incorporating the Complainant’s registered and well known… http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/…/d2008-1398.html – Cached
29 May 2003 … (i) prior to registering the Domain Name Mr. Klein was not … http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/…/d2003-0264.html – Cached
File Format: Microsoft Word – Quick View
13 Nov 2008 … The disputed domain name <aututrader.com> is registered with … http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/word/2008/d2008-1398.doc
28 Oct 2010 … The only reason for registering the Disputed Domain Name was … http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=d2010-1204 – Cached
Whether the person who is registering the domain name is attempting to …
(Mr. James Branson): The Interim Report provides in one of the sections a list of criteria on which abusive conduct should be judged, which looks to us to be a pretty good starting point if we are trying to be able to ascertain what is abusive practice. The types of considerations would be whether or not the person who has registered the name is attempting to resell that name to either a trademark rights holder or a competitor of that owner. Whether the person who is registering the domain name is attempting to register lots of trademarks particularly those which are well-known trademarks of third parties. Whether the individual who is registering the domain name is using well-known trademarks in a dilutive manner that is simply and clearly for the purpose of trying to garner the attention of people who would be looking for the well-known trademark. (above excerpt cut&pasted “directly” OUT of this referenced page) http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/processes/process1/…/usa/transcript.html – Cached
Would thus “sompletely FAIL – to notice “any” of my
Prior existing … (now) 238,000 internet page results.
From a simple google on:
“QUIX – NZ”
DUE DILIGENCE
That “deliberately” brings to light..
ANY NZ Company – whom is ALREADY TRADING –
On a brand
Such that – in order to “comply” with the NZ Company Directors Act
(for due diligence)
And:
ALL NZ Business
& Parlimentary TRADING ACTS..
No “genuine” intending NEW COMPANY DIRECTOR..
Would ever attempt.
T%o register a NEW Company – on another’s PRIOR registered INTERNATIONAL DOMAIN NAME..
Nor on that PRIOR NZ Company’s TRADING BRAND NAME “MARK”
(either Registered – or UN_REGISTERED).
But: ..
To then “also” DELIBERATELY TRADE..
Under the “original” (prior existing) NZ Company’s:
MARKS, TRADING BRANDS, & TRADING NAMES..
With the SOLE intent – of “commercially”gaining from the (ab)use of the IP & COPYRIGHTS of that:
ORIGINAL BUSINESS’s IP & COPYRIGHTED NAMES
That – in itself..
Is also — “strictly” ILLEGAL – (everywhere in the world).
see also – these in full
WRITTEN into my “SELLA” (hosted) .. QUIX – “On_line_Store”
POLICIES “warranty” section (as no “legal section” available)
2. Trademarks.
Certain trademarks, trade names, service marks and logos used or displayed on Web Sites:
All are registered and unregistered trademarks, trade names and service marks of the Web Site owner;
(and or its affiliates and suppliers).
Other trademarks, trade names and service marks used or displayed on Web Sites, even those within adsence adverts;
Are the registered and unregistered trademarks, trade names and service marks of their respective owners;
(including its affiliates and suppliers).
By (ab)using my 1999 NZ Company’s BRAND name / Trade MARK:
QUIX
(& of which- I had personally copyright “dated”- as far back- as 1965)
Sadly- I had a parting- in 1993- with my (late) ex-wife- whom had subsequently then “removed” most of my documentation thereof ..
BUT – luckily …!
I HOLD FULL WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION (dated from early in 1998)
ON LEGAL DOCUMENTS to & with my Patent Attorney- in Hamilton NZ
re:
QUIX … (TRADEMARK ENQUIRY)
And ..
After having established with them .. ?
That to “register” even just a “SINGLE” variant .. of:
QUIX
(let alone all of the OTHER ones- which I actually use)
..?..
THAT (1) “trademark” .. ALONE ..
Would have cost in the order of several million dollars (NZ)
.. across ALL NZ Business (Trademark) codes & sub-codes ..
I was thus advised .. to:
Simply MAKE as much “public” usage – of my QUIX trading names
& trading brand marks .. in as many divergent fields
(& medums) as possible ..
In order to FULLY ESTABLISH .. prior usage &:
My actual “legal_COPY_right”
In order to enable easy claim’s of fair use &/or prior use
(across ALL of NZ’s – TradeMark – registration codes)
SHOULD THE NEED EVER ARISE.
Well — I am GLAD I SAVED AS MANY PIECES OF PAPER.. as possible.
BECAUSE THE NEED HAS ARISEN.
Because of 2 illegally operating Auckland ? Plumbers “antics”
..
Thus- ALL OF MY PAPERTRAILS..
Here now- HAVE to come – with me .. INTO WORDPRESS
(as Windows Live Spaces is ALSO now merging with WordPress)
I have thus – needed to “bring” these across – in this context .. to ensure that there is NO_DEGREDATION .. (of meaning or intent) .. to my LEGAL CLAIMS .. under both NZ & International Copyright Law .. should I need to undertake NZ legal Court proceedings against anyone.
(Either now or in the future)
.. with regards to their ”breaching” – of my NZ (COPYRIGHT) TRADEMARK ..
QUIX
It is my (OWN) play on words .. (as an accronym) .. for:
? QUICK TO FIX ?
& Later (in 1998) – for my:
QU_ick_to_aff_IX
(QUIX) “Patented” HINGES
Patented Hinges – of which I might add…
That were maintained- fully Patented- for over TEN years .. (WORLD WIDE)
Hi.
Welcome to WordPress.
(from WordPress.com admin)